Received: by 2002:a5d:9c59:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 25csp2157054iof; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 21:39:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxVUov6vRXl2uXiWXvze4A3cg7SD4rhcjAj+nu7kncLUd7kMbwc7UNNRoyXDpKka6qHAYf X-Received: by 2002:a65:6912:0:b0:3fc:907b:e05 with SMTP id s18-20020a656912000000b003fc907b0e05mr27970776pgq.414.1654663199797; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 21:39:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1654663199; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dKGyY9dmblejh8Q86aDIC2Z/55B40sqz/oLe+SBVccrQ8GCdQQYsCWMHuarHgB3SNu F/dBS1Xb7Z3QevcfRKwI0Sr55ivknOjQy3mxRiIG5p430849r1qhk3/rVKBbjVcA2PRt 46i83T5MndkEMGJaC7BV0ErHdW7yVViGRg7kbhHBzrBtthV+PC9BGqeiLjPb56Bgx+GU hfJS397UW3r/mpSW4Xxvay50P0oQOhQD0CBJk2NkKM/ncgRp1oKUN+3S9mBNSLM6KiQC S6BACLfSDxly8KSmcd+fhNWpU1Ud/1NjtP2HSEqgZTpO9LZdJXfHBE7Y3SvYKPNMN4F3 sRQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=FjD4vs/RAwLUEoVxv9+kWsgNVMJPA56dd/OLIduceCs=; b=Vxr5aWlBkpjjqgwIP8u8dPCUmBVThZ6wR7KNnQfkQgBcvPL2odY7xAPtJUK8eVQWrQ BrqOZKWQ2K4hxAGUR/xdqeoBs4O5vH1KIP5ZEJ4L3sHaEWPnE8aArWoGot3wcgFZwvlt 7D/WZSSX2Tw8Gd2GHP9PpH3YX2xokEra8d0p457t7YTxl6XzxSzieASA7BI9W9n1Fkoy GOeISSnA97XLz4YePRXzoSRYQxl6JFkl6A4Hu/HwN2JQRNCR6N1O90ZF3QPTwIuq6U/m LPmmQSiTbuApue4XvwMfOCE3gGRyBTSUwlgTXh1zIs5h2rNnJR/usMQAsIAGtk+Ec/JX HMXw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=CzhAnysW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a70-20020a639049000000b003fdb58f2c5bsi10811711pge.514.2022.06.07.21.39.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Jun 2022 21:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=CzhAnysW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD6266F90; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 21:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377820AbiFGVWe (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:22:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59894 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1376644AbiFGU1F (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:27:05 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF9A3113A07; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7239B82188; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3838DC385A2; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:32:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1654626779; bh=Kw55ogd+UksAEvHHk1V0dss2Rjc0d6qyG+RxuJsUNVQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CzhAnysWMV42aJFvqgsT5SZVXEwnTRFcCkU4i+a+17FiYOr4XRsV+FJ7qi/eL+Pcr LVpWCCja7OZsH2rQmiX/BvHArNsjEzy2Nda4KnHriQ6bufI26z/bmA40cxJE2s+AkK GlMYx8xcwXhYtPK6w6YXqdpLAec78hJC738G1idI= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Cristian Marussi , Sudeep Holla , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.17 500/772] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix list protocols enumeration in the base protocol Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 19:01:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20220607165003.715302037@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220607164948.980838585@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220607164948.980838585@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Cristian Marussi [ Upstream commit 8009120e0354a67068e920eb10dce532391361d0 ] While enumerating protocols implemented by the SCMI platform using BASE_DISCOVER_LIST_PROTOCOLS, the number of returned protocols is currently validated in an improper way since the check employs a sum between unsigned integers that could overflow and cause the check itself to be silently bypassed if the returned value 'loop_num_ret' is big enough. Fix the validation avoiding the addition. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330150551.2573938-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com Fixes: b6f20ff8bd94 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol") Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c index f5219334fd3a..3fe172c03c24 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ scmi_base_implementation_list_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, break; loop_num_ret = le32_to_cpu(*num_ret); - if (tot_num_ret + loop_num_ret > MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP) { + if (loop_num_ret > MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP - tot_num_ret) { dev_err(dev, "No. of Protocol > MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP"); break; } -- 2.35.1