Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:41:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:41:05 -0500 Received: from otter.mbay.net ([206.40.79.2]:1290 "EHLO otter.mbay.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:40:47 -0500 From: John Alvord To: Mike Fedyk Cc: pil@mailnet.de, Martin Eriksson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: About 2.4.16 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:40:25 -0800 Message-ID: <3ald0uss31ah0rkfdel63n5mv7nf2bcv6h@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <3C062E3B.70CEC5D4@mailnet.de> <001a01c178d7$3c3bfa70$0201a8c0@HOMER> <3C064E91.B288EFCD@mailnet.de> <20011129125152.A496@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20011129125152.A496@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:51:52 -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: >On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:04:49PM +0100, pil@mailnet.de wrote: >> Martin Eriksson wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Oh.. 2.4.13 was pretty usable too, so maybe 3 times slower? >> > >> >> Not for me. I reported an hfs-bug for 2.4.12 up to 2.4.14. So 6 times >> slower would be the best for the users and - I guess - developers too. >> > >more/faster -pre and less/slower releases. The true limiting factor is getting an adaquate test environments run. Slowing releases down wouldn't increase that much.. john alvord - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/