Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761033AbXEUJhB (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 05:37:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755727AbXEUJgz (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 05:36:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42190 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755224AbXEUJgy (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 05:36:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:36:39 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Bill Huey Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking Message-ID: <20070521093639.GA29025@elte.hu> References: <1179657026.5915.10.camel@lappy> <20070521060446.GA4593@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20070521060828.GB20277@elte.hu> <20070521064150.GC4442@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20070521075013.GA9419@elte.hu> <20070521091848.GB4593@gnuppy.monkey.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070521091848.GB4593@gnuppy.monkey.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1560 Lines: 35 * Bill Huey wrote: > I write lockstat without the knowledge that lockdep was replicating > the same work and I audited 1600 something lock points in the kernel > to convert the usage of C99 style initializers to something more > regular. you got the history wrong i think: the first version of lockdep was released to lkml a year ago (May 2006), while the first time you mentioned your lock contention patch was November 2006 and you released it to lkml in December 2006 - so it was _you_ who was "replicating the same work", not lockdep :-) And this was pointed out to you very early on, many months ago. and regarding C99 style lock initializers: the -rt project has been removing a whole heap of them in the past 2.5 years, since Oct 2004 or so, and regularly cleansed the upstream kernel for old-style initializers ever since then - so i'm not sure what you are referring to. > I also did this without consideration of things like debuginfo since I > don't use those things. btw., you dont even need CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO to get usable symbol names, CONFIG_KALLSYMS alone will do it too. (It's only if you really cannot tell from the lock symbol name and the function name what the entry is about - which is very rare - that you need to look at any debug-info) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/