Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     jreuter@yaina.de, ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org,
        thomas@osterried.de, Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3] net: ax25: Fix deadlock caused by skb_recv_datagram in ax25_recvmsg
Date:   Wed,  8 Jun 2022 09:29:23 +0800
Message-Id: <20220608012923.17505-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Precedence: bulk

The skb_recv_datagram() in ax25_recvmsg() will hold lock_sock
and block until it receives a packet from the remote. If the client
doesn`t connect to server and calls read() directly, it will not
receive any packets forever. As a result, the deadlock will happen.

The fail log caused by deadlock is shown below:

[  369.606973] INFO: task ax25_deadlock:157 blocked for more than 245 seconds.
[  369.608919] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[  369.613058] Call Trace:
[  369.613315]  <TASK>
[  369.614072]  __schedule+0x2f9/0xb20
[  369.615029]  schedule+0x49/0xb0
[  369.615734]  __lock_sock+0x92/0x100
[  369.616763]  ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x20/0x20
[  369.617941]  lock_sock_nested+0x6e/0x70
[  369.618809]  ax25_bind+0xaa/0x210
[  369.619736]  __sys_bind+0xca/0xf0
[  369.620039]  ? do_futex+0xae/0x1b0
[  369.620387]  ? __x64_sys_futex+0x7c/0x1c0
[  369.620601]  ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x19/0x40
[  369.620613]  __x64_sys_bind+0x11/0x20
[  369.621791]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[  369.622423]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[  369.623319] RIP: 0033:0x7f43c8aa8af7
[  369.624301] RSP: 002b:00007f43c8197ef8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031
[  369.625756] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f43c8aa8af7
[  369.626724] RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055768e2021d0 RDI: 0000000000000005
[  369.628569] RBP: 00007f43c8197f00 R08: 0000000000000011 R09: 00007f43c8198700
[  369.630208] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff845e6afe
[  369.632240] R13: 00007fff845e6aff R14: 00007f43c8197fc0 R15: 00007f43c8198700

This patch moves the skb_recv_datagram() before lock_sock() in order that
other functions that need lock_sock could be executed. What`s more, we
add skb_free_datagram() before goto out in order to mitigate memory leak.

Suggested-by: Thomas Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Reported-by: Thomas Habets <thomas@@habets.se>
---
Changes in v3:
  - Add skb_free_datagram() before goto out in order to mitigate memory leak.

 net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
index 95393bb2760..62aa5993093 100644
--- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
+++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
@@ -1665,6 +1665,11 @@ static int ax25_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
 	int copied;
 	int err = 0;
 
+	/* Now we can treat all alike */
+	skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err);
+	if (!skb)
+		goto done;
+
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	/*
 	 * 	This works for seqpacket too. The receiver has ordered the
@@ -1672,14 +1677,10 @@ static int ax25_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
 	 */
 	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET && sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
 		err =  -ENOTCONN;
+		skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/* Now we can treat all alike */
-	skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err);
-	if (skb == NULL)
-		goto out;
-
 	if (!sk_to_ax25(sk)->pidincl)
 		skb_pull(skb, 1);		/* Remove PID */
 
@@ -1725,6 +1726,7 @@ static int ax25_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
 out:
 	release_sock(sk);
 
+done:
 	return err;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1