Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:34:41 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Moshe Kol <moshe.kol@mail.huji.ac.il>
Cc:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Yossi Gilad <yossi.gilad@mail.huji.ac.il>,
        Amit Klein <aksecurity@gmail.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com,
        feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com,
        fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [tcp] e926147618: stress-ng.icmp-flood.ops_per_sec -8.7%
 regression
Message-ID: <20220608073441.GE7547@1wt.eu>
References: <20220608060802.GA22428@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
 <20220608064822.GC7547@1wt.eu>
 <CACi_AuAr70bDB79zg9aAF1rD7e1qGgFwCGCAPYtS-zCp_zA0iw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACi_AuAr70bDB79zg9aAF1rD7e1qGgFwCGCAPYtS-zCp_zA0iw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 10:26:12AM +0300, Moshe Kol wrote:
> Hmm, How is the ICMP flood stress test related to TCP connections?

To me it's not directly related, unless the test pre-establishes many
connections, or is affected in a way or another by a larger memory
allocation of this part.

Willy