Received: by 2002:a5d:9c59:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 25csp115690iof; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:48:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzptUCm+1UkdA74kiN/d8mreXjWE+pkDsk8xVx12ZLj6TsQsuT02wyFvr9GHtaEmS5UXVq8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2cc3:b0:6f8:5a21:4d62 with SMTP id hg3-20020a1709072cc300b006f85a214d62mr34857711ejc.256.1654732112210; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:48:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1654732112; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EN+zkTjpx0Y6Oa8IMPEU714vvy38fKXDKSJf7Nzl8PkklbcnVnR9m28dcv610VR4re YVXbqc/XGSATukjDRv2/v6PuiMrotNblJ5UihPJE4tMQKpToegp5Am5OYj1pbGcXIger e1v4kgDQIayF7d2KdZwkgYhXvAUTxg43RkAbRZP/EuSR6VoEG1usrU8MIjGkoAgeDEVD 3X+B6o4aIoCaQOFgF5xAOzFpUfhzViNxh1gPO5m0c23ezInhYG/STmtu6J5J1lZhwKSg +4pH2eqLdJEdTg8qiG+EXZFcyocH/tITB/joc1FcGNrxmVPBxCR7lCK6aVRjpUkjoCmG czlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=7YvbnxXMryXWMsjSaz1Ekl/JpgVzZCjALJ/1ZepPv50=; b=tMl8o0rYwq4C3yqesxYuVk6clXxRlmnNigJ234AO4sDm87diEbvXIPwRRSljYyrmZ0 P54PsdNYrCzeb8LcgSIW4aChx5GnY38fqhAPrAr6wvMwUnJAyqyEKbUnO3uTpwSDw1SJ jihxKb5vCJ3OYDR4RvalS9fQZppcEoMetm1cSgnXcTDIM136G1ZA8sGT5kjN3NSYed7k E8YwSRmLXeW1QOeaecbsMNre1Yueob0WsWTIWST4CqT2miOG5Mhl6PJvZbaJH8Iw+Cif zp9jbEQK0ZWZa1B3yTlT5UlxtOW1jmcPffGgO7jjvLlZuuv7bcyDjK7Dn26plissCb0+ XB7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=mZDxGrd4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c4-20020a056402158400b0042acd0c265asi22487200edv.352.2022.06.08.16.47.44; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=mZDxGrd4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234087AbiFHXml (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 19:42:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47656 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234294AbiFHXmj (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 19:42:39 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5DCFAFAD5 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id s39so11525540ybi.0 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:44:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7YvbnxXMryXWMsjSaz1Ekl/JpgVzZCjALJ/1ZepPv50=; b=mZDxGrd4G/FXAlzUGMy+s+aMzzkBbXRGQX1OHO/y9mtGdDWKN3FDCN49F8E5CjRHEe nXIaKYS8iAszBSSddmfyFAr35b96F0Fj4JpoiqlWkSvK9rnxrF2UJYwS7U5b29ABsqvO WrpZRK1cyQlnMVutnjeNjFPN0tD6vt9oyV3mN4rn0udSaYEZEKLPQTYSM4Lm1lTHBYA6 An/8ykts9cW76kb+mmVHFwJ9vNYiLuVquNc+hnlLIGuceVY11yjleVLHRwPYSHx0/o1H pvAm7XyC4oW8zfsk0xxLOktBIZQz7msgNo+iRgkFBYMjGH+6Twtty7ZRAWUukOWh2yR7 K86g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7YvbnxXMryXWMsjSaz1Ekl/JpgVzZCjALJ/1ZepPv50=; b=CHsKFpZOLt9nrMz6HQYzoFDogGIpDZiOgetFBpktmqXqfxkKdQW2ASClA3+7zCGiZG sUefBIBejie1a1SOri6xYx6eBfyXfLLeoZkOcDA8+PcK2wVL2ytBG1Pugmhl8Ca7jFqO 6FI2r9TwzFCBaV4KUxVwy292MpZO0S1x17VQjtoZHIqPHON4nuQgjw0IZexOZcknZqJE 9ZPaI4br+GHXk/np3cWvXpGO5by/wRYksdOTViNxbWjpcILmZwxEvZ1JDrTv4ditj0fO yxKurBpZZkVBaveRweznDtwnXUulyrMp4WkZueGnNovpj0oZT6uvg3D7wILPPkbNtmEQ O9qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532upC2sx7xYQ8M98GC/mTEUdBOmh51POYBuAy5onU75Md0/rqTM INejnZCBZK1QVxUf8iMsYDwdBYs7ZeI5hDYtPPc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:12ca:b0:65c:a34c:39cf with SMTP id j10-20020a05690212ca00b0065ca34c39cfmr36298170ybu.476.1654731864951; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:44:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220603035415.1243913-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: patrick wang Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 07:44:11 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: kmemleak: store objects allocated with physical address separately and check when scan To: Kuan-Ying Lee Cc: "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?B?WWVlIExlZSAo5p2O5bu66Kq8KQ==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:46 AM Kuan-Ying Lee wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 11:54 +0800, Patrick Wang wrote: > > The kmemleak_*_phys() interface uses "min_low_pfn" and > > "max_low_pfn" to check address. But on some architectures, > > kmemleak_*_phys() is called before those two variables > > initialized. The following steps will be taken: > > > > 1) Add OBJECT_PHYS flag and rbtree for the objects allocated > > with physical address > > 2) Store physical address in objects if allocated with OBJECT_PHYS > > 3) Check the boundary when scan instead of in kmemleak_*_phys() > > > > This patch set will solve: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527032504.30341-1-yee.lee@mediatek.com > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/9dd08bb5-f39e-53d8-f88d-bec598a08c93@gmail.com > > Hi Patrick, > > If this patchset fix the above issue, I think we need to add > the below fixes tag. > > Fixes: 23c2d497de21 ("mm: kmemleak: take a full lowmem check in > kmemleak_*_phys()") Hi Kuan-Ying, Thanks for taking a look. This series should solve the false positive on ppc32 and arm64. And the false positive on arm64 is triggered by commit 23c2d497de21. So I will add the fixes tag. Thanks, Patrick