Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <2d00e87d-9e84-2ea1-605f-ee08e8a1b467@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:58:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Use proc_douintvec_minmax() limit
 minimum value
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
        mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220607101807.249965-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
 <YqGTJsf2R9hBz2bi@localhost.localdomain>
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <YqGTJsf2R9hBz2bi@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/9/22 08:28, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Guess I'm not opposed to the change, even if, as the changelog also
> says, we should be already checking for sane values.

I share this opinion.

-- Daniel