Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:49:11 -0500
From:   Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gdsc: Bump parent usage count when GDSC is
 found enabled
Message-ID: <20220609134911.xmk5x6qbfu5r7nmd@halaneylaptop>
References: <20220606212112.3617731-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
 <20220607121548.fhzpjcmoahlkue4t@halaneylaptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220607121548.fhzpjcmoahlkue4t@halaneylaptop>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 07:15:48AM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 02:21:12PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > When a GDSC is found to be enabled at boot the pm_runtime state will
> > be unbalanced as the GDSC is later turned off. Fix this by increasing
> > the usage counter on the power-domain, in line with how we handled the
> > regulator state.
> > 
> > Fixes: 1b771839de05 ("clk: qcom: gdsc: enable optional power domain support")
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> > index 44520efc6c72..a1fa7c4cff60 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> > @@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ static int gdsc_init(struct gdsc *sc)
> >  				return ret;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		/* ...and the power-domain */
> > +		gdsc_pm_runtime_get(sc);
> > +
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Votable GDSCs can be ON due to Vote from other masters.
> >  		 * If a Votable GDSC is ON, make sure we have a Vote.
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1
> > 
> 
> Makes sense to me!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>

Gah, too trigger happy -- I missed checking the return of
gdsc_pm_runtime_get() as Stephen pointed out in his reply.
I think with that in place feel free to add my R-B.

Thanks,
Andrew