Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:29:03 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/16] ACPI: container: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()
Message-ID: <YqIRv8xnGciF2wBd@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <1843211.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher>
 <3131424.5fSG56mABF@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3131424.5fSG56mABF@kreacher>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:58:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
> use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
> the given ACPI device's children.

...

> +	return acpi_dev_for_each_child(ACPI_COMPANION(&cdev->dev),
> +				       check_offline, NULL);

I would find this on one line better and not missing important details after
80th character.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko