Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:40:57 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/16] ACPI: bus: Introduce
 acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse()
Message-ID: <YqIUiQEOJVFSvATD@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <1843211.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher>
 <2137459.Mh6RI2rZIc@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2137459.Mh6RI2rZIc@kreacher>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Make it possible to walk the children of an ACPI device in the revese
> order by defining acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse() in analogy with
> acpi_dev_for_each_child().

...

> +	return device_for_each_child_reverse(&adev->dev, &adwc,
> +					     acpi_dev_for_one_check);

Perhaps one line?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko