Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764054AbXEUS2O (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 14:28:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762556AbXEUS17 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 14:27:59 -0400 Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.142]:51514 "EHLO rutherford.zen.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756650AbXEUS17 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 14:27:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4651E4A8.7010009@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:27:52 +0100 From: Matt Keenan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Davidsen CC: Ray Lee , Linux Kernel M/L Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48 References: <464F57DD.2000309@tmr.com> <2c0942db0705191322p54e05e40p512146f21f68299a@mail.gmail.com> <464F99EC.3080006@tmr.com> In-Reply-To: <464F99EC.3080006@tmr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.27.224] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1941 Lines: 45 Bill Davidsen wrote: > Ray Lee wrote: >> On 5/19/07, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> I generated a table of results from the latest glitch1 script, using an >>> HTML postprocessor I not *quite* ready to foist on the word. In any >>> case >>> it has some numbers for frames per second, fairness of the processor >>> time allocated to the compute bound processes which generate a lot of >>> other screen activity for X, and my subjective comments on how >>> smooth it >>> looked and felt. >>> >>> The chart is at http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/sched_smooth_01.html for >>> your viewing pleasure. >> >> Is the S.D. columns (immediately after the average) standard >> deviation? If so, you may want to rename those 'stdev', as it's a >> little confusing to have S.D. stand for that and Staircase Deadline. >> Further, which standard deviation is it? (The standard deviation of >> the values (stdev), or the standard deviation of the mean (sdom)?) >> > What's intended is the stddev from the average, and perl bit me on > that one. If you spell a variable wrong the same way more than once it > doesn't flag it as a possible spelling error. > > Note on the math, even when coded as intended, the divide of the > squares of the errors is by N-1 not N. I found it both ways in online > doc, but I learned it decades ago as "N-1" so I used that. N-1 is for estimating the standard deviation from a random sample of a population (s), N is for calculating the standard deviation of a whole population (σ). xref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation Yes, I am aware of the potential for Wikipedia articles to be wrong, but this article seems correct at first blush :) Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/