Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:57:55 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 000/144] KVM: selftests: Overhaul APIs, purge VCPU_ID
Message-ID: <YqKXExV4BOVRbOVc@google.com>
References: <20220603004331.1523888-1-seanjc@google.com>
 <21570ac1-e684-7983-be00-ba8b3f43a9ee@redhat.com>
 <CAAhSdy0_50KshS1rAcOjtFBUu=R7a0uXYa76vNibD_n7s=q6XA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAhSdy1N9vwX1aXkdVEvO=MLV7TEWKMB2jxpNNfzT2LUQ-Q01A@mail.gmail.com>
 <YqIKYOtQTvrGpmPV@google.com>
 <YqKRrK7SwO0lz/6e@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YqKRrK7SwO0lz/6e@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

+s390 folks...

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022, Anup Patel wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:26 PM Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:57 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Marc, Christian, Anup, can you please give this a go?
> > > >
> > > > Sure, I will try this series.
> > > 
> > > I tried to apply this series on top of kvm/next and kvm/queue but
> > > I always get conflicts. It seems this series is dependent on other
> > > in-flight patches.
> > 
> > Hrm, that's odd, it's based directly on kvm/queue, commit 55371f1d0c01 ("KVM: ...).
> 
> Duh, Paolo updated kvm/queue.  Where's Captain Obvious when you need him...
> 
> > > Is there a branch somewhere in a public repo ?
> > 
> > https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/tree/x86/selftests_overhaul
> 
> I pushed a new version that's based on the current kvm/queue, commit 5e9402ac128b.
> arm and x86 look good (though I've yet to test on AMD).
> 
> Thomas,
> If you get a chance, could you rerun the s390 tests?  The recent refactorings to
> use TAP generated some fun conflicts.
> 
> Speaking of TAP, I added a patch to convert __TEST_REQUIRE to use ksft_exit_skip()
> instead of KVM's custom print_skip().  The s390 tests are being converted to use
> TAP output, I couldn't see any advantage of KVM's arbitrary "skipping test" over
> TAP-friendly output, and converting everything is far easier than special casing s390.