Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762133AbXEVAVP (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 20:21:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756926AbXEVAVA (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 20:21:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:58532 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756696AbXEVAVA (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 20:21:00 -0400 Message-ID: <465236EF.40102@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:18:55 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tejun Heo , Maneesh Soni , stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] - fix oops in sysfs_readdir References: <4651E0C9.3080609@redhat.com> <20070521153935.b549db8f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070521153935.b549db8f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1689 Lines: 37 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2007 13:11:21 -0500 > Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> This is a non-ida backport of Tejun's patch in -mm at: >> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc1/2.6.22-rc1-mm1/broken-out/gregkh-driver-sysfs-allocate-inode-number-using-ida.patch >> for the 2.6.16 -stable tree - it follows the same scheme of using s_ino to safely >> store & retrieve the inode number of sysfs entries for use in sysfs_readdir, >> but uses a brain-dead-simple inode nr allocator rather than ida, which would >> bring along a lot of newer, more complex code. >> >> No, this doesn't guarantee uniqueness of sysfs inode numbers, but then >> the code in -stable today doesn't either - and with this change, at least >> it shouldn't oops. > > So I'm sitting here whether to commend this patch to google kernel maintainers > for 2.6.18 backport, but I realise I don't know what it does. And I don't know > if it fixes the reclaim-time oopses they were intermittently seeing, or if it > fixes something else and if so what that is. > > Sigh. Better changelogs, please. > Sorry Andrew. I referenced Tejun's upstream patch in -mm which has a nice changelog etc, and this is a backport of that, and does the same thing in the same way and solves the same problem - but that doesn't help if you just want to toss this message into your patch stack. Will fix up & resend. -Eric -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/