Received: by 2002:a5d:925a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e26csp1211699iol; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 09:08:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyg/5MF5RpLwv7w715eq5x4SNdxhFl/kQQHs1pVGPPMH2cdt4pRKwCPoDLet9sfBKZvipDq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2710:b0:42e:28c9:fa7 with SMTP id y16-20020a056402271000b0042e28c90fa7mr55959636edd.2.1655050116552; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 09:08:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655050116; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hT1f9A173abzNd/cfLwP7siRZzFddjxgKGjRQav9azr7MMRalZcFwYt3dJozrNdYAU hmEQ5lRnZGaj5VqufWZcwITqD53E98XlIKewnLm1/eExs4f11ei2cMivZjhywLQqGvoy /X6iwhZIzDRzz5u0z+sdFNldSZ/QQ7PyJ6OYDtaviVQtyREWHHQqITvp3L4IHhaNDDVz xMx9KrMu7oF8sbvNeHv5fvk0TvkquJjbjFPGhV78+LY7QfYTmLmICsPF47U14m4qSajR HcRT+0pN+aDVkrmPsRols11MfNqp9vRn1DSpSy3f1dFqTGMhffhwcDta9bFUTSTbc5fC EkqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=9iYYPUBMwsHySjLDiTlVPvdJJdAhgA81ZQiGNHcHfNA=; b=Itp9vFwTl239GzL4TN77pYzKoJ1kNSGQpaPHCWyuPgy3diZCIi+ChKEDsubhrNvo3p tRNZeFjhmkhXCFtkVGCzvIvAvs6jSG50R6wGXaVVYXZXcB09NiHSMSPzivhJXLILkLEd KEhv/+HpVp/rMjLbqq7wIR5ugiXFXHkAdf+zxH+eNHhdc94Bma+Zd/VeJWcPLhnwND+k toCMfQEBkEVMg2N4uywLcvUNCcyjs332+sXpZ76NcO8XfYu6xGQcnowp15jvVDP4T3Z6 K/RE89ns0nkRVSCSMURNBGE7XDgpbiL9h4r7eG1RhsqSsOsXxpSvNpdf06AOIkNo1W3e vksA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=yO3FtOpg; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=EeTC0ebU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codewreck.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cs16-20020a170906dc9000b006f3d2558d4bsi5990709ejc.496.2022.06.12.09.08.12; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 09:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=yO3FtOpg; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=EeTC0ebU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codewreck.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235920AbiFLKC5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 12 Jun 2022 06:02:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51682 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232186AbiFLKC4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2022 06:02:56 -0400 Received: from nautica.notk.org (ipv6.notk.org [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:7a93::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486D443EFB; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 03:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id E99C9C021; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 12:02:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1655028171; bh=9iYYPUBMwsHySjLDiTlVPvdJJdAhgA81ZQiGNHcHfNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yO3FtOpgpAxer63Z1GXbrZ+gQLJu642e8OpF80jzhpIiB4m2dmiZLOyeXVFomnZSS SAbu2gO4RWoCj7jstiUXA4q28Ua/wXgtcdcqoL8VV5EkgcCTsf47+Y4/Fy8Xrljzrf u/B0BOKM9P49kJaKS2D5sVsmljLOwtvzB00lAS5KM1MlD1fdXR44VQR+pTUSZJZqja ggwdoUF8pS2pnLr8C5VzN4EKqa0K3cPXS4vS/rstM8ABtN/67L9MptX4Nabc8nH7SS 1hKN2ty9B9WcGf7ZEfVrOo9OCrWQOR/n6hssK662YA8TCMUKIsEgvTHNdLHXBsbAo9 gXrO2RnhrKpfQ== X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4875FC009; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 12:02:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1655028170; bh=9iYYPUBMwsHySjLDiTlVPvdJJdAhgA81ZQiGNHcHfNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EeTC0ebUcRiISvGDUnwsaU34a9zolEPSV10j4IXlfo4lyS3EINqQGQWVOKYgjBMUP uyvDlVq9cUBtsLoyn8LzosM5g0HgLL5w8GhzEF2assNb43/xW8ZjJqMXbGo9YS3Q67 MWOi9Kp38t5QFqSoOoVDOx966P4kyYZEy6ajylPiQ3E9iiYpmjjrecngOekXRg7GI9 Spo30AvsOJtERGFuD/OzDL7mUb4O359JAoWJfS4XPgO/jHVFJPYvmmCplYR1jvwCd6 c/OqulvVjaVkJ5SSXgj95uXWIdLW1y6s2+vjB+YwoSCk1xNzeGHv50VLV/QSYA8tmq 9pm8YjJq7yTPg== Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 4ae5bd25; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 19:02:27 +0900 From: asmadeus@codewreck.org To: David Howells , Christian Schoenebeck Cc: David Kahurani , davem@davemloft.net, ericvh@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Greg Kurz Subject: Re: 9p EBADF with cache enabled (Was: 9p fs-cache tests/benchmark (was: 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected)) Message-ID: References: <7091002.4ErQJAuLzZ@silver> <3645230.Tf70N6zClz@silver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3645230.Tf70N6zClz@silver> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, I had planned on working on this today but the other patchset ended up taking all my time... I think I'm bad at priorities, this is definitely important... David, I think with the latest comments we made it should be relatively straightforward to make netfs use the writeback fid? Could you find some time to have a look? It should be trivial to reproduce, I gave these commands a few mails ago (needs to run as a regular user, on a fscache mount) --- $ dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=1 $ chmod 200 test # drop cache or remount $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=test bs=102 seek=2 count=1 conv=notrunc dd: error writing 'test': Bad file descriptor --- Otherwise I'll try to make some more 9p time again, but it's getting more and more difficult for me... Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 06:46:04PM +0200: > I had another time slice on this issue today. As Dominique pointed out before, > the writeback_fid was and still is opened with O_RDWR [fs/9p/fid.c]: > > struct p9_fid *v9fs_writeback_fid(struct dentry *dentry) > { > int err; > struct p9_fid *fid, *ofid; > > ofid = v9fs_fid_lookup_with_uid(dentry, GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, 0); > fid = clone_fid(ofid); > if (IS_ERR(fid)) > goto error_out; > p9_client_clunk(ofid); > /* > * writeback fid will only be used to write back the > * dirty pages. We always request for the open fid in read-write > * mode so that a partial page write which result in page > * read can work. > */ > err = p9_client_open(fid, O_RDWR); > if (err < 0) { > p9_client_clunk(fid); > fid = ERR_PTR(err); > goto error_out; > } > error_out: > return fid; > } > > The problem rather seems to be that the new netfs code does not use the > writeback_fid when doing an implied read before the actual partial writeback. > > As I showed in my previous email, the old pre-netfs kernel versions also did a > read before partial writebacks, but apparently used the special writeback_fid > for that. This looks good! Thanks for keeping it up. > > I added some trap code to recent netfs kernel version: > > diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c > index 8bba0d9cf975..11ff1ee2130e 100644 > --- a/net/9p/client.c > +++ b/net/9p/client.c > @@ -1549,12 +1549,21 @@ int p9_client_unlinkat(struct p9_fid *dfid, const char *name, int flags) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_client_unlinkat); > > +void p9_bug(void) { > + BUG_ON(true); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_bug); > + > int > p9_client_read(struct p9_fid *fid, u64 offset, struct iov_iter *to, int *err) > { > int total = 0; > *err = 0; > > + if ((fid->mode & O_ACCMODE) == O_WRONLY) { > + p9_bug(); > + } > + > while (iov_iter_count(to)) { > int count; > > @@ -1648,6 +1657,10 @@ p9_client_write(struct p9_fid *fid, u64 offset, struct iov_iter *from, int *err) > p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_9P, ">>> TWRITE fid %d offset %llu count %zd\n", > fid->fid, offset, iov_iter_count(from)); > > + if ((fid->mode & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDONLY) { > + p9_bug(); > + } > + > while (iov_iter_count(from)) { > int count = iov_iter_count(from); > int rsize = fid->iounit; > > Which triggers the trap in p9_client_read() with cache=loose. Here is the > backtrace [based on d615b5416f8a1afeb82d13b238f8152c572d59c0]: > > [ 139.365314] p9_client_read (net/9p/client.c:1553 net/9p/client.c:1564) 9pnet > [ 139.148806] v9fs_issue_read (fs/9p/vfs_addr.c:45) 9p > [ 139.149268] netfs_begin_read (fs/netfs/io.c:91 fs/netfs/io.c:579 fs/netfs/io.c:625) netfs > [ 139.149725] ? xas_load (lib/xarray.c:211 lib/xarray.c:242) > [ 139.150057] ? xa_load (lib/xarray.c:1469) > [ 139.150398] netfs_write_begin (fs/netfs/buffered_read.c:407) netfs > [ 139.150883] v9fs_write_begin (fs/9p/vfs_addr.c:279 (discriminator 2)) 9p > [ 139.151293] generic_perform_write (mm/filemap.c:3789) > [ 139.151721] ? generic_update_time (fs/inode.c:1858) > [ 139.152112] ? file_update_time (fs/inode.c:2089) > [ 139.152504] __generic_file_write_iter (mm/filemap.c:3916) > [ 139.152943] generic_file_write_iter (./include/linux/fs.h:753 mm/filemap.c:3948) > [ 139.153348] new_sync_write (fs/read_write.c:505 (discriminator 1)) > [ 139.153754] vfs_write (fs/read_write.c:591) > [ 139.154090] ksys_write (fs/read_write.c:644) > [ 139.154417] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) > [ 139.154776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:115) > > I still had not time to read the netfs code part yet, but I assume netfs falls > back to a generic 9p read on the O_WRONLY opened fid here, instead of using > the special O_RDWR opened 'writeback_fid'. > > Is there already some info available in the netfs API that the read is > actually part of a writeback task, so that we could force on 9p driver level > to use the special writeback_fid for the read in this case instead? -- Dominique