Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu) by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:35:29 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:35:18 -0400 Received: from pec-58-36.tnt4.b2.uunet.de ([149.225.58.36]:2602 "EHLO router.abc") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:34:14 -0400 Message-ID: <3985919F.3ADB81AD@baldauf.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:47:59 +0200 From: Xuan Baldauf Organization: Medium.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,de-DE MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree Cc: reiserfs@devlinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: (reiserfs) Re: sync: why disk cannot spin down References: <39858A9F.C272E4E8@baldauf.org> <20000731163127.G2224@lxMA.mediaways.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Content-Length: 1060 Lines: 36 Matthias Andree wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Xuan Baldauf wrote: > > > > > does not necessarily spin up the disk! > > > > > > Because you have to issue a drive reset. > > > > This is my intent, not to spin up the disk. (In my previous case, sync > > always spun up the disk because the filesystem was not mounted with > > "noatime".) > > This will still not work, since after some time, the kernel starts > missing the drive acknowledgements and eventually issues a reset > condition on that IDE channel. See my other mail for details. You tell me the kernel starts missing drive ACKs even if there are no read or write requests pending? Even then, the drive was never in sleep mode (requires reset), it always was in standby mode (does not require reset). My primary intent is to reduce the noise of the drive, not the power consumption. > > -- > Matthias Andree Xu?n.:o) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/