Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp753964iog; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:11:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sM/QAkLsOxMSPqwOdynF4uEbyAGVHXfXGPGWrbuuWGW8SA1lCp42MpjKvAP/0UUyK5c1Af X-Received: by 2002:a62:544:0:b0:51b:a90d:64d3 with SMTP id 65-20020a620544000000b0051ba90d64d3mr445875pff.40.1655147485601; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:11:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655147485; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CtcCJjD2Gmug4jeUqKEZPMexC6bIe/63FDRSjCh/T5NBZg7ktfYXYx+pCqlqj+dbRN WffzD2C+Lak7h0COuNUIn+Jg3uvOfDtd9PGx0prnkBNvxkzTJSWXsRfKWrL77hdCI367 us1FtMh02vEfOPtAUUd1TBFfodPeE6zVXmTYHvCWwSp1DbrQkiro5xI3y9k2fQuJI3SJ CIO7OCF7SWP/Xg6ylbKyj5RRQJPsrwMlCyDrKY8wy/hA0FhrBhxcOYehtkCU/RUvcIxy mFj0DUj7rZ/Iss4kfqktrGm86gFYJhdPLTNZtpQiZUEk2JWwjm0+1BAFHPNYPNL1ms+T pT8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=n1aOeSCucMlesNCCRbsD3f826Lst7fe0VJm8o+wL2qU=; b=syDo2OiuRi6fR7xPz96yDXvA0WSRkN6SvE9uT9fl17c2BUe+1++SaSA9mod5lbZLD1 wKCqo1vKY9OWB1ZvR7lfVfjyFuyPSDlQ5CKVGL+RVqzmSe9D+Bf21oaH5w3+nKkfSdOb y9A/TDuZRoS/s245cjhsmBdPsp/zGnQVhlL3nsWhtWI0+0o408bWp8AZ4QAZdgCPCzrL z0Sy64wfrnRCBEPBWGtzJ0glkx1gIlKNHn0BkqHydjmByBJUeo5eOYw/A4E+J7wgh4fA 8e30N7pbgyBMCcjy5+0lJOM91fduNBu0cBSjFJOWIk5bmUeeSnJnUilomITdyTBOheAi ArNQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=oXzTTV46; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x5-20020a63fe45000000b003fc0bd70856si10808585pgj.807.2022.06.13.12.11.13; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=oXzTTV46; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242721AbiFMSjD (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 14:39:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37230 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240749AbiFMSiD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 14:38:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEE1BD412B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 07:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id c196so5985456pfb.1 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 07:57:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=n1aOeSCucMlesNCCRbsD3f826Lst7fe0VJm8o+wL2qU=; b=oXzTTV46vVDTPhtcVK+mb6IMkjk14rzEAtaoq4N3vxKrdtW9TNsDScN0/pwNrYNRp2 7APpfdbz+9LAmKolpMbZqlnagL7nIV+MRAcanOOZ7XOyMFafp9kEqokLsvfSl1U14VY8 7FxEvt58JkNHjcwnw8Og1Hrf4QjQldYwGdxEuxZDR4hiyhyEwjm6iEWcU2gIH28woxLQ F/JyKMq0WRoEGJklPhruQUgOdXIz/Nm9F9U9zUbpy39GSmhZo/xO1kgY5Jpxoa6OEVij 1PnajADFxtkIhtXjSZtIiYO1VLnzpyfY8xeojENrPuC4nZfu/vwVgeiqFOY86s0Pe4tX RQZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=n1aOeSCucMlesNCCRbsD3f826Lst7fe0VJm8o+wL2qU=; b=fBQP2oSBomnxuld1rgsCb4740pGrvCe81u4+F1WtI+vJeXMXKjzO9lY/XUMpaArKvF lm7hQVefSAD1yCSTBMVniO7vMywgok1Qjb8XtBrBb4eA1ci1xQGGg895R7O2wfBy6sDL YG042Hp1J6Xt9K6fufTadilUVB4o2LJ0sou11RKP0qlK91X9PReHKBkoSJXqSgzUEDri oWg2HYb0odvINGKNO5gPGm7JydqiuJ7zhUn8IqWwX98G9AZ3WWUESO3gIfsdHddbkHVr iSCOfyUVaBJMoqEv/dCnPRfYIDE+GRK9lKhc/8N8Y6tB+Ry7H93DT6fJFJEhj4rmU69O 1LGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TPgBoOSpa2B2tUi94DW6NPxgWYuv21Q/883nvpGvRzy9F0iCi HVFhEtT+m1uxCPnZHbdU9NM3nQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d507:0:b0:3fb:22d1:8a51 with SMTP id c7-20020a63d507000000b003fb22d18a51mr9817pgg.377.1655132272169; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 07:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11-20020a63b90b000000b003c265b7d4f6sm5540339pge.44.2022.06.13.07.57.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 14:57:48 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Anup Patel , KVM General , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Andrew Jones , David Matlack , Ben Gardon , Oliver Upton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , Sean Christopherson , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 000/144] KVM: selftests: Overhaul APIs, purge VCPU_ID Message-ID: References: <20220603004331.1523888-1-seanjc@google.com> <21570ac1-e684-7983-be00-ba8b3f43a9ee@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 6/10/22 02:34, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > I pushed a new version that's based on the current kvm/queue, commit 5e9402ac128b. > > arm and x86 look good (though I've yet to test on AMD). > > > > Thomas, > > If you get a chance, could you rerun the s390 tests? The recent refactorings to > > use TAP generated some fun conflicts. > > I did so, rebased over David's nested dirty_log_perf_test patches and pushed > to kvm/queue. Wahoo! Thanks! And a huge thanks to Drew for the reviews!