Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934665AbXEVTjr (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 15:39:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758711AbXEVTjj (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 15:39:39 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44910 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755127AbXEVTji (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 15:39:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:36:45 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Dave Jones , Chuck Ebbert , linux-kernel , Chris Wright Subject: Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle Message-ID: <20070522193645.GB885@kroah.com> References: <46533314.10206@redhat.com> <20070522184733.GA9357@kroah.com> <20070522185353.GE12157@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070522185353.GE12157@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1413 Lines: 33 On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 02:53:53PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:47:33AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 02:14:44PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > I'd like to propose we allow adding new device IDs as part > > > of the -stable process, but only under certain conditions: > > > > Who would be the primary benifactor of this? > > > > The very large majority of users out there use a distro kernel, and they > > provide the ids whenever possible as patches to their kernels, _or_ as a > > config option at startup that adds the ids to the drivers through sysfs. > > It does mean however that there's lots of duplicated work between > distros as everyone adds these patches anyway. But distros don't all standardize on the same -stable release anyway, so I don't see how a large ammount of duplicated work happens here. > > What's wrong with the current sysfs way of adding new device ids without > > touching the kernel? > > sure, that works in some cases, but for others (quirks etc) it obviously doesn't. I totally agree, and have never objected to quirk additions in the past. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/