Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp1161614iog; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:48:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyi+fHwlbKXXvXlFr7es3H8iyKtJb60ftw7Q1JS5hTesxo6RfJGzkTO0TLRHvrYrQS6r700 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:358a:b0:6f4:2903:417e with SMTP id o10-20020a170906358a00b006f42903417emr3002428ejb.592.1655189311529; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:48:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655189311; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r7HDHRujWn93FiQyG3h9ve9osGocpbIowkQwklTz8HSTskpQa0RorGp1l6ZaTHUUjm ebJz70rnkMgLv33HGqK7Y8J51rWk+QnslCYVkxALiravNx5VsTLqr3gDbIlEls3td5DB ZtNIVdzDyV3iYO49Z5G2Gpy2TxyAQeRs3bbiCGrchwo0uNUTXki6ijkcK5Tpdh41J2yQ fghcP+pgwHijhvFgxoYIaLT+dMbKmM4r5IdAAdV2wumHko4MnxDTFrgAXBjhFRx4z3QM 1HHvFucyQlPmlvjqY2DX6aFHyP6n2DZU9UHwXti8W+Jv0jgb2i6WgqpTBvNV+wxFiGuU YVLw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=FCMLUl3Q6J5xhdHsMvlx5MMZvUbK4DhE00JUzmf579k=; b=oFAvPy8kN6PlhdPJExnDGzDBu4IRR6+IF47xYJ9OCCWLYoAG4xE/nyK5+56btxI5sC pr7sskIgcl2V9wEQGpmut1svUoIsVcmkw1qeOwH+cBpmkn182l4xshDDN95mIRtJDbfU iPriD4jcZuTX9Q1wIx50yaZsqFIbzWzpKTbxDoKjHYGP8hQeWxylaT8PVx06UozTcWaY XBrr3e8yVo1blyYW+vjXWTIZyCqehjJfIDY4a8Y2SCYJxjRNbGda6xyBLDwXh51FdkKg m0G+Ua9BCMeop/KF8RxfnVteF+IBW+SXVkbgCrFKQ3v/TLJajcMcQvLaLoI6htXw6za6 aLkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y5-20020a056402134500b0042de6a75618si10080374edw.66.2022.06.13.23.48.05; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:48:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239093AbiFNGnr (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 Jun 2022 02:43:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47448 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352254AbiFNGnJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2022 02:43:09 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2920638D87; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id BE14568AA6; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:43:03 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Garry Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, brking@us.ibm.com, hare@suse.de, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/18] blk-mq: Add a flag for reserved requests Message-ID: <20220614064303.GA31683@lst.de> References: <1654770559-101375-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1654770559-101375-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1654770559-101375-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:29:02PM +0800, John Garry wrote: > Add a flag for reserved requests so that drivers may know this for any > special handling. > > The 'reserved' argument in blk_mq_ops.timeout callback could now be > replaced by using this flag. And we should probably do that ASAP, independent of the rest of this series. Otherwise looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig