Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935587AbXEVWPu (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 18:15:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761717AbXEVWPe (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 18:15:34 -0400 Received: from web52612.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.48.215]:32194 "HELO web52612.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1761351AbXEVWPc (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 18:15:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=PAq6gy6jGQ/Gnp0TKSOspLMd4kfMNWvJbueJkO4aH/brMSBW7i4Qd6GeGGoT0gYEf/3+HcpM1pF3Y+01biwshgnvA5Z1R45CCz8mAstWGk6qzzOXyhCA7xnsPYz/q/LFN5yaQPZYAVKZgCUGLsQmCktk1+xAM2xJubi1lupkrys=; X-YMail-OSG: vx4AJm0VM1ltgB9oS8aUrx3dY0.RLVzb28o2kPrUjuOeR0mK3C3U_rg1kQ_NzrqJew5qjI1fAtsT0dUMctMl16HZb7uAJO1Y_Dn60FQn2B.bhDBNvKi1L5E5_0PWJ0iP6lu74fOof__Nrmk- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 08:15:30 +1000 (EST) From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] 2.6.22-rc2 panics on x86-64 with slub To: Hugh Dickins , Christoph Lameter Cc: Ingo Molnar , Oliver Xymoron , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <376320.95285.qm@web52612.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1494 Lines: 38 --- Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote: [...] > > Compiled slub with SMP & CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. No luck. It still hangs > solid [...] > You've made no mention of trying the patch I sent yesterday, or better, > the patch Christoph replied with to replace it. Please clarify whether > you're getting the above after applying one of those patches - thanks. Sorry about that :-(. Was a busy day & skipped a few emails :-(. Indeed with Christoph's patch (over the hg commit 57109:745e2df8ec60), without CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG, but with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING only under the kernel debugging section, on CONFIG_SMP the slub kerenel is quite stable. (It's running some stress tests now, but things are looking good.) (If you want me to test it with other slub or kernel debug options please let me know. It just takes a lot of time to eliminate the variables, if there are problems.) Thanks folks. ___________________________________________________________________________________ How would you spend $50,000 to create a more sustainable environment in Australia? Go to Yahoo!7 Answers and share your idea. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/aunz/lifestyle/answers/y7ans-babp_reg.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/