Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758297AbXEVWtW (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 18:49:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756366AbXEVWtK (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 18:49:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:36498 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756323AbXEVWtJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 18:49:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:49:00 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel , rdunlap@xenotime.net Subject: Re: RFC: Schedule EFS for removal. Message-ID: <20070522224900.GE22628@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Willy Tarreau , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel , rdunlap@xenotime.net References: <20070521144618.GA6914@redhat.com> <20070521150242.GA25146@infradead.org> <20070521150937.GB6957@redhat.com> <20070521151209.GA25744@infradead.org> <20070521152050.GC6957@redhat.com> <20070521154613.GA27027@infradead.org> <20070521171109.GC9653@redhat.com> <20070522210152.GM943@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070522210152.GM943@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1187 Lines: 32 On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:01:54PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > "Under 2.4.21, it doesnt do this." > > > > > > Randy mentioned in bugzilla that 2.4.22 didn't work either, so I'd > > > be very surprised if 2.4.21 works. > > > > good point. I don't see anything obvious in 2.4.22 that would have > > caused a regression, so this sounds suspect. > > I'll close the bugzilla out based on your comments, thanks for looking at it. > > In my experience, often when people speak about 2.4.21 (which is quite old), > they in fact refer to an RHEL3 kernel, which has a "few" addon patches :-) > While I don't think that anything related to EFS might be changed in RHEL, > may it be possible that it works as a side effect of a patch in this > kernel ? > > That's just pure guess anyway. not unless it's a recompiled version. As shipped, RHEL3 has.. # CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/