Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760260AbXEWB3G (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 21:29:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757432AbXEWB24 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 21:28:56 -0400 Received: from fwstl1-1.wul.qc.ec.gc.ca ([205.211.132.24]:19490 "EHLO ecqcmtlbh.quebec.int.ec.gc.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756841AbXEWB2z convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 21:28:55 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [patch 00/69] -stable review Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:28:34 -0400 Message-ID: <8E8F647D7835334B985D069AE964A4F7028FE807@ECQCMTLMAIL1.quebec.int.ec.gc.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [patch 00/69] -stable review Thread-Index: Aceb94KfUgM+rd3HSLeyFZ52YSsC/gA4VU9g References: <20070521191612.800400000@sous-sol.org> <20070521123148.a3dad5f2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070521222004.GT6291@stusta.de> <46521BFD.7040703@redhat.com> From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" To: "Chuck Ebbert" , "Adrian Bunk" Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Chris Wright" , "Andi Kleen" , , , "Justin Forbes" , "Zwane Mwaikambo" , "Theodore Ts'o" , "Randy Dunlap" , "Dave Jones" , "Chuck Wolber" , "Chris Wedgwood" , "Michael Krufky" , , , "Michal Piotrowski" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 May 2007 01:28:34.0882 (UTC) FILETIME=[AE432220:01C79CD9] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1445 Lines: 37 > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Chuck Ebbert > Envoy? : 21 mai 2007 18:24 > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700 > >> Chris Wright wrote: > >> > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release. > >> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :( ... > > > > If only it would fix all of them... > > > > Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in > > 2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before > > 2.6.21 was released). > > Yeah, 2.6.21 seems awfully buggy, and patches to fix many of > the bugs haven't appeared. > > Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order... Hi, If there is a new stable 2.6.20 / 2.6.21, would it be possible that they both contain also this patch to keep the same behaviour between 2.6.20 -> 2.6.22 kernels regarding paravirt_ops GPL export? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7 Thnx! - vin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/