Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 18:54:54 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "Katakam, Harini" <harini.katakam@amd.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "git (AMD-Xilinx)" <git@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx
 emaclite driver binding
Message-ID: <20220614185454.7479405c@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1ae6dce1-0c5c-64f0-c6a4-b0f11a82f315@linaro.org>
References: <1654793615-21290-1-git-send-email-radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>
        <5e5580c4d3f84b9e9ae43e1e4ae43ac0a2162a75.camel@redhat.com>
        <MN0PR12MB5953590F8098E46C02943AFEB7AA9@MN0PR12MB5953.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
        <1ae6dce1-0c5c-64f0-c6a4-b0f11a82f315@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:48:43 -0700 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > I have seen a mixed set of the convention for dts patches. They are following
> > both routes i.e device tree or subsystem repos provided acked from device
> > tree maintainer.  If there is preference for device tree repo then I can drop
> > net-next from subject prefix and resend it for the dt repo.  
> 
> If you got Ack from Devicetree bindings maintainer (Rob Herring or me),
> then feel free to take it via net-next. I think, it is actually
> preferred, unless this is some fix which needs to go via DT (Rob's) tree.
> 
> If you don't have these acks, then better don't take it :) unless it's
> really waiting too long on the lists. I hope it's not that case.

GTK, thanks. I'm also often confused by the correct tree for DT patches.
I'll revive the patch in PW and apply it later today.