Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220522162802.208275-1-luca@z3ntu.xyz> <20220522162802.208275-11-luca@z3ntu.xyz>
 <Yqjti8s06LIfTE52@shikoro>
In-Reply-To: <Yqjti8s06LIfTE52@shikoro>
From:   Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 19:13:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMZdPi_c931ejPA2Nkim1cwBS9sdcTNnfUEvUOvFSsfrdN18AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/14] i2c: qcom-cci: add msm8974 compatible
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Todor Tomov <todor.too@gmail.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:20, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 06:27:58PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > From: Matti Lehtim=C3=A4ki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com>
> >
> > MSM8974 CCI is the same as MSM8916 except it has two masters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtim=C3=A4ki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> > ---
> > To note, the cci_v1_5_data variable name is just a bit arbitrary and
> > isn't meant to reflect IP version "1.5". I'd be happy to change the
> > variable name to something else.
>
> Loic, Robert: I know this series is marked RFC, but the I2C patches
> adding a new SoC to the driver are maybe interesting already?

Yes I agree, no objection to get them.

Regards,
Loic