Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220504002554.654642-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
 <20220504011345.662299-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> <20220504011345.662299-13-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
 <Yp3udPy0vuDK8khc@qian> <20220606161940.fh5edq5nyz4jru2u@revolver>
 <Yp4uD8uWB3rit/Ee@qian> <CAOUHufZk+3xCqK38CuVdWg_ZiWaLyke+Y+=CYJpraET6nKQ=yQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOUHufbOz66HPebrCuJXfnfapY0qxu42-1Ppbti86Yii-GYsAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20220615142508.mtp65w6tdiurtvcn@revolver>
In-Reply-To: <20220615142508.mtp65w6tdiurtvcn@revolver>
From:   Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:07:53 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOUHufaoZ99qkBfsRWwCAx6fspL5KJYgCGe=nOVR07_2dF6URQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 28/69] mm/mmap: reorganize munmap to use maple states
To:     Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc:     Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
        "maple-tree@lists.infradead.org" <maple-tree@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:25 AM Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> * Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> [220611 17:50]:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 2:11 PM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 10:40 AM Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:19:52PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > > > > Does your syscall fuzzer create a reproducer?  This looks like arm64
> > > > > and says 5.18.0-next-20220603 again.  Was this bisected to the patch
> > > > > above?
> > > >
> > > > This was triggered by running the fuzzer over the weekend.
> > > >
> > > > $ trinity -C 160
> > > >
> > > > No bisection was done. It was only brought up here because the trace
> > > > pointed to do_mas_munmap() which was introduced here.
> > >
> > > Liam,
> > >
> > > I'm getting a similar crash on arm64 -- the allocator is madvise(),
> > > not mprotect(). Please take a look.
> >
> > Another crash on x86_64, which seems different:
>
> Thanks for this.  I was able to reproduce the other crashes that you and
> Qian reported.  I've sent out a patch set to Andrew to apply to the
> branch which includes the fix for them and an unrelated issue discovered
> when I wrote the testcases to cover what was going on here.

Thanks. I'm restarting the test and will report the results in a few hours.

> > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in mab_mas_cp+0x2d9/0x6c0
> > Write of size 136 at addr ffff88c5a2319c80 by task stress-ng/18461
                                                       ^^^^^^^^^

> As for this crash, I was unable to reproduce and the code I just sent
> out changes this code a lot.  Was this running with "trinity -c madvise"
> or another use case/fuzzer?

This is also stress-ng (same as the one on arm64). The test stopped
before it could try syzkaller (fuzzer).