Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp1026216iog; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:44:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sNktVN9Fcs5LC8mzsI9CisccYz5Af/leAw/LEidSoef9ePCjb6/1FFmk+4IyKipVSNBZvd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7a56:b0:712:a26:8d71 with SMTP id i22-20020a1709067a5600b007120a268d71mr2383047ejo.728.1655343881584; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:44:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655343881; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AHDcfDKeKGrutXC1owfH917VSG5oXHB71Ydoi1r6fUznRKRipmzYgBdqI+CGmMBrWQ 0NlnWL1Fm8QLUEweBwBQYzzEGeloIv/ehDKCXdlik8fDm2frnBW2KxOhnmR+n7uLe40l Lp20xAVqN5Zv4JfJzChl43U9saw3txd1T7HLPUpxZmH56cX67Hz+bieH6gW2gPaqa8In HsbeBXZupMRH33qPMFxhLvUlSpxtn2NRPbrlRZG95vGV8pCv8gLrmnpVNv/50kBhTnLP rOE5Tei7ogcet9AGDTHA+KYXUsSAlHFjY9EZdx8mU37aJ3//0IbBo81dckxkUgDgmVmE thyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=9cli+lN6iLIU/IOXpdKV77reY8kXl0ddYGlmKFZOuFQ=; b=OUvv6HGrMRUkQA3Vrib4gS2mAtYnOFDUY9x8stQvlRZT5ummh8utknIvqolP/wJ5Zk zMC3Iq+aui5nNOFg+nfdrVNSM8aibn7rUFYQj109ZllE68A3QIUxSUDK1VuBhHTriuMU mF/PP2nSmvXBNqqWefHxwYkgB3b8VofffKnCZLqNXso5oAJshLzMRz3Hx3vLE1IvTr6Q DA077MbT4Xe/z4/p/k6y9IQ6LIP6b9NvdUB+OpWFsSym+OavAbG+0pIYCFc2t/VzSaCl gsN3UWGtoK5oOzwVRLByZAm9UIqxeaBKEMuvsZ7KH31996DAEe0c5AIREEzZsDwaeVIx vaqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n8-20020a50cc48000000b0042bcd41832fsi880459edi.400.2022.06.15.18.44.16; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:44:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345815AbiFPBmT (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:42:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344998AbiFPBmP (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:42:15 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5795580F0; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LNlFS4Kc7zSh0h; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:38:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:42:11 +0800 Received: from [10.67.111.205] (10.67.111.205) by kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:42:10 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC 09/13] perf kwork: Add workqueue report support To: Namhyung Kim CC: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel , linux-perf-users References: <20220613094605.208401-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> <20220613094605.208401-10-yangjihong1@huawei.com> <81afcdb8-0bbf-a28b-d944-770ca3de0397@huawei.com> From: Yang Jihong Message-ID: <1131f97d-6a8a-6c29-c60e-292cd612468f@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:42:10 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.111.205] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 2022/6/16 5:56, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 8:22 PM Yang Jihong wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> On 2022/6/15 5:54, Namhyung Kim wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:48 AM Yang Jihong wrote: >>>> >>>> Implements workqueue report function. >>>> >>>> test case: >>>> >>>> # perf kwork -k workqueue rep >>>> >>>> Kwork Name | Cpu | Total Runtime | Frequency | Max runtime | Max runtime start | Max runtime end | >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> (w)0xffffffff83e09fa0 | 0001 | 2152.678 ms | 194 | 12.376 ms | 2059361.546621 s | 2059361.558997 s | >>>> (w)0xffff888332fea180 | 0000 | 17.125 ms | 301 | 1.018 ms | 2059358.441070 s | 2059358.442089 s | >>>> (w)0xffff8881035a83d8 | 0007 | 7.556 ms | 3 | 3.212 ms | 2059362.614643 s | 2059362.617855 s | >>>> (w)0xffff888102fc14a0 | 0002 | 7.080 ms | 5 | 1.962 ms | 2059365.421753 s | 2059365.423714 s | >>>> (w)0xffffffff82f7da00 | 0000 | 4.277 ms | 7 | 3.778 ms | 2059360.851063 s | 2059360.854841 s | >>>> (w)0xffffffff8305d680 | 0006 | 1.796 ms | 1 | 1.796 ms | 2059360.046818 s | 2059360.048613 s | >>>> (w)0xffff8883339e9040 | 0005 | 1.659 ms | 2 | 1.619 ms | 2059361.266051 s | 2059361.267670 s | >>>> (w)0xffff888333de9040 | 0007 | 1.121 ms | 5 | 0.783 ms | 2059368.238059 s | 2059368.238842 s | >>>> (w)0xffff888332fe9040 | 0000 | 0.990 ms | 4 | 0.911 ms | 2059359.604075 s | 2059359.604986 s | >>>> (w)0xffff8883331e9040 | 0001 | 0.244 ms | 6 | 0.046 ms | 2059362.689277 s | 2059362.689323 s | >>>> (w)0xffff888102e44400 | 0007 | 0.239 ms | 2 | 0.137 ms | 2059363.117537 s | 2059363.117674 s | >>>> (w)0xffff8883333ea180 | 0002 | 0.141 ms | 5 | 0.049 ms | 2059365.423784 s | 2059365.423833 s | >>>> (w)0xffffffff83062f28 | 0006 | 0.084 ms | 2 | 0.047 ms | 2059358.208033 s | 2059358.208080 s | >>>> (w)0xffffffff8305ca48 | 0003 | 0.078 ms | 2 | 0.041 ms | 2059361.071371 s | 2059361.071412 s | >>>> (w)0xffff8883337e9040 | 0004 | 0.062 ms | 1 | 0.062 ms | 2059362.605723 s | 2059362.605785 s | >>>> (w)0xffff8881035a81e8 | 0001 | 0.056 ms | 1 | 0.056 ms | 2059363.118231 s | 2059363.118287 s | >>>> (w)0xffff8883335e9040 | 0003 | 0.026 ms | 1 | 0.026 ms | 2059358.573397 s | 2059358.573423 s | >>>> (w)0xffffffff83062e70 | 0006 | 0.023 ms | 1 | 0.023 ms | 2059368.398864 s | 2059368.398888 s | >>>> (w)0xffffffff83e06480 | 0002 | 0.000 ms | 1 | 0.000 ms | 2059359.986792 s | 2059359.986792 s | >>> >>> Using "function" in the tracepoint and symbolizing it would be >>> far more intuitive. >>> >> OKļ¼ŒThis is a simplified version that will be improved in the next >> version, and I'd like to add the following features: >> 1. Supports the kthread profile. > > Could you elaborate more? trace kthread tracepoints (sched:sched_kthread_work_queue_work, sched: sched_kthread_work_execute_start and sched:sched_kthread_work_execute_end) can support kthread profile, because framework has been set up. we only need to add a new kthread class class. > >> 2. Save runtime and latency in kernel using ebpf(similar to "perf >> record: Implement off-cpu profiling with BPF") . This reduces the number >> of interruptions caused by writing files to hard disks, which is closer >> to the actual scenario. > > Sounds great. OK, I'll add it in next version. > >> >> This RFC is sent to discuss to see if this function is useful to the >> community and can be accepted by the community. :) > > Yeah I think it'd be useful. Thanks for your affirmation. Thanks, Jihong