Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:48:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:48:01 -0500 Received: from hq2.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.199]:40460 "HELO hq2.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:47:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 05:41:26 -0700 From: Victor Yodaiken To: Alexander Viro Cc: "David C. Hansen" , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove BKL from drivers' release functions Message-ID: <20011130054126.A18099@hq2> In-Reply-To: <3C057410.3090201@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Organization: FSM Labs Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:57:28AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > In other words, patch is completely bogus. BKL removal may be a good > idea, but you really need to audit the code. Which requires at least > some understanding of the things you are doing. There _are_ races > and they need to be dealt with. But blind BKL removal doesn't fix any > and breaks quite a few places where the code was actually correct. People seem to believe that BKL is worse than added spin-locks, but I very much doubt this is always true. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/