Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934756AbXEWRTb (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2007 13:19:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756906AbXEWRTX (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2007 13:19:23 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:53731 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756240AbXEWRTW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2007 13:19:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:19:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Srihari Vijayaraghavan cc: Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Oliver Xymoron , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] 2.6.22-rc2 panics on x86-64 with slub In-Reply-To: <294534.72400.qm@web52611.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <294534.72400.qm@web52611.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 731 Lines: 15 On Wed, 23 May 2007, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote: > I'm personally very happy that slub works stably without slub debug options, > because that's what I'd run in a production env. Thanks to your patch, slub is > quite stable without the slub debug for me :-)). But it'd to nice to have a > working slub debug for test env., as you'd undoubtedly be aware of, of course > :-). Just my humble opinion. Just switching off lockdep should make you happy until we figure out what is wrong? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/