Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To:     broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
        ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
        sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v15 6/6] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable()
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:02:19 -0500
Message-Id: <20220617180219.20352-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220617180219.20352-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
References: <ff68fb850d42e1adaa6a0a6c9c258acabb898b24>
 <20220617180219.20352-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() for ARM64. This works like
arch_stack_walk() except that it returns -EINVAL if the stack trace is not
reliable.

Until all the reliability checks are in place, arch_stack_walk_reliable()
may not be used by livepatch. But it may be used by debug and test code.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index eda8581f7dbe..8016ba0e2c96 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -383,3 +383,26 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
 
 	unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie);
 }
+
+/*
+ * arch_stack_walk_reliable() may not be used for livepatch until all of
+ * the reliability checks are in place in unwind_consume(). However,
+ * debug and test code can choose to use it even if all the checks are not
+ * in place.
+ */
+noinline int notrace arch_stack_walk_reliable(
+					stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
+					void *cookie,
+					struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	struct unwind_state state;
+	bool reliable;
+
+	if (task == current)
+		unwind_init_from_caller(&state);
+	else
+		unwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
+
+	reliable = unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie);
+	return reliable ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+}
-- 
2.25.1