Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:28:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:28:24 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:50960 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:28:17 -0500 Subject: Re: Slow start -- Linux vs. NT -- it's time to acknowledge the problem! To: jessica@twu.net (Jessica Blank) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:36:31 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Jessica Blank" at Nov 30, 2001 08:35:35 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > http://www.sun.com/sun-on-net/performance/tcp.slowstart.html This URL has no bearing or relation to the things you seem to be reporting. There are hundreds of possible and more likely reason (load on that ethernet segment, half/full duplex, 10/100Mbit settings) or even incorrect irq configuration that are rather more plausible It can also be highly card dependant how a box behaves on an overloaded lan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/