Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 21:42:23 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc:     frederic@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu/nocb: Correct output rcuog/rcuop kthreads
 information
Message-ID: <20220618044223.GK1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <20220617141519.1677119-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220617141519.1677119-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:15:19PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> This commit make rcuog and rcuop thread information output
> in the correct location.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>

Good catch, queued for review and testing, thank you!

Ditto for the "rcu: Avoid reporting strict QSes from NMI context"
patch.

As always, I wordsmithed both commit logs, so please check to see if
I messed something up.

						Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  v1->v2:
>  Only change commit information, the v1 is
>  [PATCH] rcu: Fix incorrect judgment condition in show_rcu_nocb_state(). 
> 
>  kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index a8f574d8850d..f20aec4f4394 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -1452,8 +1452,8 @@ static void show_rcu_nocb_gp_state(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  		(long)rdp->nocb_gp_seq,
>  		rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_gp_loops),
>  		rdp->nocb_gp_kthread ? task_state_to_char(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread) : '.',
> -		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread ? (int)task_cpu(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread) : -1,
> -		show_rcu_should_be_on_cpu(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread));
> +		rdp->nocb_gp_kthread ? (int)task_cpu(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread) : -1,
> +		show_rcu_should_be_on_cpu(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread));
>  }
>  
>  /* Dump out nocb kthread state for the specified rcu_data structure. */
> @@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@ static void show_rcu_nocb_state(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  		".B"[!!rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass)],
>  		rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist),
>  		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread ? task_state_to_char(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread) : '.',
> -		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread ? (int)task_cpu(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread) : -1,
> +		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread ? (int)task_cpu(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread) : -1,
>  		show_rcu_should_be_on_cpu(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread));
>  
>  	/* It is OK for GP kthreads to have GP state. */
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>