Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762172AbXEXDUG (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2007 23:20:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758230AbXEXDT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2007 23:19:56 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:48533 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758167AbXEXDT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2007 23:19:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:18:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Jesse Barnes cc: Olivier Galibert , Robert Hancock , linux-kernel , Andi Kleen , Chuck Ebbert , Len Brown Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources In-Reply-To: <200705231959.26963.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Message-ID: References: <4635510D.4060103@shaw.ca> <200705231555.07683.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <200705231959.26963.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 789 Lines: 21 On Wed, 23 May 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > So what do you think? You ok with enabling mmconfig if it's available as long > as we use type 1 accesses for non-extended stuff? If so, I think the patches > are pretty much ready... Sure. I think mmconfig is perfectly sane if it falls back to conf1 accesses for legacy stuff.. And I also actually think that your patch to disable MMIO/PIO when testing the BAR size is fine - I just think that it should likely only be done for non-bridge devices (or at least non-host-bridge). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/