Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 19 Jun 2022 14:51:44 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Anurag Kumar Vulisha <anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: phy: make phy-cells description a text
Message-ID: <Yq8N0ASsp3e+rDAd@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
References: <20220619113325.21396-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <Yq8LHN+WGVpXDwiM@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
 <8fbee49a-8215-32b7-3545-66df70ecc38d@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8fbee49a-8215-32b7-3545-66df70ecc38d@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 01:46:17PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/06/2022 13:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch.
> > 
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 01:33:25PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> The description field is a string, so using YAML inside phy-cells
> >> description is not actually helpful.
> > 
> > Does it hurt though ? For xlnx,zynqmp-psgtr.yaml I wrote it that way to
> > prepare for a future where it could be described using a YAML schema
> > (but such future may never come).
> 
> No, it does not hurt. It is however confusing some folks and they think
> schema goes into description. The description should be
> readable/descriptive for humans, so if you think your approach is
> better, I am perfectly fine with it.

I don't mind much. If you think it would be a good idea to eventually
describe the #phy-cells elements in YAML schema then I'd rather keep the
current description, if there's very little chance it will happen, I
don't mind changing it.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart