Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 19 Jun 2022 19:12:48 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Yuze Chi <chiyuze@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix is_pow_of_2
Message-ID: <20220619171248.GC3362@bug>
References: <20220603041701.2799595-1-irogers@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20220603041701.2799595-1-irogers@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Precedence: bulk

Hi!

> From: Yuze Chi <chiyuze@google.com>
> 
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -4956,7 +4956,7 @@ static void bpf_map__destroy(struct bpf_map *map);
>  
>  static bool is_pow_of_2(size_t x)
>  {
> -	return x && (x & (x - 1));
> +	return x && !(x & (x - 1));
>  }

I'm pretty sure we have this test in macro in includes somewhere... should we use
that instead?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html