Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220619111115.6354-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> <20220619111115.6354-2-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
In-Reply-To: <20220619111115.6354-2-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 09:50:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUoa9H3Nw7ctAbueeVOdJEo_D25niS7E07HWwV2H4Z9Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] RISC-V: Create unique identification for SoC PMU
To:     Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
Cc:     Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gTcOhcmlvIERvbWluZ29z?= 
        <joao.mario@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>, linux@yadro.com,
        Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

Hi Nikita,

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 1:11 PM Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> wrote:
> From: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>
>
> Provide RISC-V SBI PMU id to distinguish different cores or SoCs via
> "devices/platform/riscv-pmu/id" sysfs entry.
>
> The identification is generated as string of marchid, mimpid, mvendorid
> in hex format separated by coma - "0x70032,0x70032,0x0".
>
> The CSRs are detailed in the RISC-V privileged spec [1].
> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual
>
> Inspired-by: João Mário Domingos <joao.mario@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c

> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -693,6 +693,28 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static ssize_t id_show(struct device *dev,
> +                               struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +       int len;
> +       struct riscv_pmu *pmu = container_of(dev_get_drvdata(dev), struct riscv_pmu, pmu);
> +
> +       len = sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pmu->pmuid);
> +       if (len <= 0)
> +               dev_err(dev, "invalid sprintf len: %d\n", len);

How can this fail?

Please use sysfs_emit() instead of sprintf(), and drop the error
message.

> +
> +       return len;
> +}

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds