Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <d4972a70-8ddf-a394-3e8f-08fb778622d8@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:37:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rpmsg: qcom: glink: replace strncpy() with
 strscpy_pad()
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
References: <20220519073330.7187-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <640d2a3d-4c38-b921-45c1-048c255b5a9d@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <640d2a3d-4c38-b921-45c1-048c255b5a9d@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 09/06/2022 10:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/05/2022 09:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The use of strncpy() is considered deprecated for NUL-terminated
>> strings[1]. Replace strncpy() with strscpy_pad(), to keep existing
>> pad-behavior of strncpy, similarly to commit 08de420a8014 ("rpmsg:
>> glink: Replace strncpy() with strscpy_pad()").  This fixes W=1 warning:
>>
>>   In function ‘qcom_glink_rx_close’,
>>     inlined from ‘qcom_glink_work’ at ../drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c:1638:4:
>>   drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c:1549:17: warning: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 32 equals destination size [-Wstringop-truncation]
>>    1549 |                 strncpy(chinfo.name, channel->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
>>
>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Split series per subsystem.
> 
> Any comments on these?

I sent first iteration in May, then on 19th of May. There is review from
Stephen.

On 9th of June I pinged but the patchset is still waiting. Anyone minds
me taking these?

Best regards,
Krzysztof