Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <c92b0b51-0e59-72ab-5306-ccec92b0cb94@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:35:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: qcom: correct kerneldoc
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
References: <20220519073349.7270-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220519073349.7270-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 19/05/2022 09:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Correct kerneldoc warnings like:
> 
>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c:68:
>     warning: expecting prototype for struct minidump_subsystem_toc. Prototype was for struct minidump_subsystem instead
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> 

Although these warnings are not that important, they are still warnings
we want to fix to be able to compile with W=1.

Is there anyone willing to pick it up? Any other comments?


Best regards,
Krzysztof