Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752081AbXEXROU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:14:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750747AbXEXROM (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:14:12 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:44611 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805AbXEXROL (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:14:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:14:04 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Rob Landley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Status of CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING? Message-ID: <20070524171404.GC4470@stusta.de> References: <200705231510.52932.rob@landley.net> <46549937.1030306@linux.intel.com> <20070523212237.GH2098@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 991 Lines: 31 On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:29:39PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On May 23 2007 23:22, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >And we need only two different inline levels (__always_inline and > >"let the compiler decide"), not three (__always_inline, inline and > >"let the compiler decide"). > > "inline" is "let the compiler decide". If it is not, then it is "let the > compiler decide, based on my bias that I think it should be inlined". Wrong. "static" is "let the compiler decide". > Jan cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/