Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751639AbXEXRZn (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750786AbXEXRZg (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:36 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:43662 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757AbXEXRZf (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4655CA84.5060103@goop.org> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:25:24 +0100 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Balbir Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner , pranith-kumar_d@mentorg.com, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14 References: <20070523120616.GA23407@elte.hu> <20070524064235.GA2386@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070524080959.GA29151@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070524080959.GA29151@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 585 Lines: 15 Ingo Molnar wrote: > nice! I've merged your patch and it built/booted fine so it should show > up in -v15. This should also play well with Andi's sched_clock() > enhancements in -mm, slated for .23. > BTW, does CFS treat sched_clock as a per-cpu clock, or will it compare time values of sched_clock()s called on different CPUs? J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/