Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp3543769iog; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:25:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u8fjusBdhoO9Hpl3r1N/Imw84hYK6JEBF9aoeszyoVsJ2uFUn/w18zo5BJJOPgJ9PuY6Yx X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:35cb:b0:435:89f5:288d with SMTP id z11-20020a05640235cb00b0043589f5288dmr7725946edc.311.1655796323704; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:25:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655796323; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Piv4sg8YcVMD/KVa5g+1aljj+NOOUC8ihkhM5eCETwcmO/0Ny0YkJ5cuIbZ1aO+ka+ 0cd5yf51pTByjHyRqTROj5BBYwG4LMduwBfwRrmRLpLhxrcvxuwyTRUJObupKMCVPucJ OwvXgGyicbfU/UzvmzoRndzEXFT2PyMztSCUDxAEu0/hNplg0Nu1nj0tewJZlYWJ9a/C ptiYP1CDKUsxhlvRMH031qVQWM6D/HNSpRcux87sQDl8QSOR4pSdV4Z4+5Gmfd2vcWbL f7dgtZQKb1ycaYVPnVurA+m17uOrTqoLJskqlZTffH2qVcISfz6SQsLwY2CL4VH66zVA GKRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=5BtOB1xQhN3Ha4LlKucv6D1ctcTjHBCQ1Tbc7a6of4E=; b=WSudWnRMK07beKn9AsuAcGt3UeoE2KiStYH6PwrPr2F9lSb5PybgsgcA1xxD0VBgSG +OBPdVaKbSeJljFKYKq3y17FCukPh+Qbkbm71/3de6EB+dcVIpv/lpvm45WQGm9ez3Si 4jD2ZjzmTotlDGMX/34/F9GaRafg4+Axk47QyaX0HUrunWvvZeGWVuwCqqe6ICdpCdOV Ap9apRFGNWC/Jz6xmpOsMKZAnym9uLwH5aXENWibSmS6pi9sxxccE0d+xAXWy1gYP8O6 8zLO4cWNNtFAcz+n77xL3Nim0dxxMt4OQbiGvoOZsOol0AEhjpfnJJBsrrM2K6YAwPF0 xVgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@rasmusvillemoes.dk header.s=google header.b=TKmlBWKS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i11-20020aa7dd0b000000b004356c0d7435si9306214edv.508.2022.06.21.00.24.58; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@rasmusvillemoes.dk header.s=google header.b=TKmlBWKS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346866AbiFUHUG (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Jun 2022 03:20:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346857AbiFUHUB (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2022 03:20:01 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A1322509 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id d19so14353778lji.10 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:19:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rasmusvillemoes.dk; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5BtOB1xQhN3Ha4LlKucv6D1ctcTjHBCQ1Tbc7a6of4E=; b=TKmlBWKSf8Jf8np6blHHUe6nVaX0uPVSfRFhasrZwmd39FDSNZl4XaFeCsICHLe4pe 3iOJppArYeaDr2n/QMIizqb+wkXnDzvlBOu764SDa08phIvvR0BisPlPrIGCXIVdWjaF 9hJOf3de+mMSi/wW2M72YQSCDX6/H5o3mF1TA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5BtOB1xQhN3Ha4LlKucv6D1ctcTjHBCQ1Tbc7a6of4E=; b=JC+rh/vWz4Uehtgu4BU9HIZ0bSBVszfXLOiIiAdx8NGULiBShZHg2602OXP8eoJbDe J1rhIYvkkRmWIAUAWvH1eAm3ukBx3vibToenXbkIkFqNsEzqW9hC2Xs5erbv4OAJLgEG JoDOvQvj4Vu1ecjgLNl4TUDw2vs8yv3tmJUsLce0Yq3Zt8ArYKXh721zfvecRObrJBa2 eM56IJ2Xx/JvPEWW7nEIQDWuEIiBfsMzwRQ4RoyHcg8NXQ0FDXbCfH96HFiODow0w7+/ HLTJstRGdmp2oZRV8y96JGKH2ZFbtGEIRiLevA9+CdgXI0yzTBUhN835XqCdPvgW+sKb Hcng== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/tFFsRVwENe0iTeMdYqmWcaTO3bTquxiyxloct8ZKQBXxnsBRQ KYFhRMcP+gS0jzlQTi0rZuw7+A== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:99c5:0:b0:255:7dc1:3b1 with SMTP id l5-20020a2e99c5000000b002557dc103b1mr13775416ljj.277.1655795998108; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.11.74] ([81.216.59.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13-20020ac25f4d000000b0047f4291a10esm2062922lfz.163.2022.06.21.00.19.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:19:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/34] test_printf: Drop requirement that sprintf not write past nul Content-Language: en-US To: Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pmladek@suse.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, enozhatsky@chromium.org, willy@infradead.org References: <20220620004233.3805-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> <20220620004233.3805-14-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> From: Rasmus Villemoes In-Reply-To: <20220620004233.3805-14-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/06/2022 02.42, Kent Overstreet wrote: > The current test code checks that sprintf never writes past the > terminating nul. This is a rather strange requirement, completely > separate from writing past the end of the buffer, which of course we > can't do And which of course you don't check anymore. So any statement about "all tests passing after these patches" is not worth much. So NAK in this form, but perhaps if/when my year-old patch gets picked up (or you could include it in the series) we can talk about eliminating the check for past-nul-before-end-of-buffer writes. Rasmus