Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:47:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:47:01 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-038-163.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.163]:40210 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:46:50 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy , Henning Schmiedehausen Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:49:11 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Jeff Garzik , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1007140529.6655.37.camel@forge> <20011130092730.Q14710@work.bitmover.com> In-Reply-To: <20011130092730.Q14710@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Larry, On November 30, 2001 06:27 pm, Larry McVoy wrote: > I think that if you ask around, you'll find that the pros use a coding > style that isn't theirs, even when writing new code. They have evolved > to use the prevailing style in their environment. I know that's true for > me, my original style was 4 space tabs, curly braces on their own line, > etc. I now code the way Bill Joy codes, fondly known as Bill Joy normal > form. Err, because you're still working at Sun? I'll just ignore that last little non sequitur, your comment about professionals adapting to the prevailing standards is right on. On the other hand, the idea of a coding style hall of shame - publicly humiliating kernel contributers - is immature and just plain silly. It's good to have a giggle thinking about it, but that's where it should stop. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/