Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752632AbXEXRxX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:53:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752233AbXEXRxI (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:53:08 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:45064 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387AbXEXRxH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:53:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:53:07 -0700 From: Greg KH To: art@usfltd.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: usb-scanner-cameras kernel-2.6.22 and udev-095 problem Message-ID: <20070524175307.GA18940@kroah.com> References: <20070517190058.w2oyxzf9wko4w8k8@67.106.77.50> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070517190058.w2oyxzf9wko4w8k8@67.106.77.50> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2209 Lines: 55 On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:00:58PM -0500, art@usfltd.com wrote: > greg > > and part of /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules > > ... > ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end" > SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end" > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4100C > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0101", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20 (C5101A) | Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20xi > (C7150A) > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0102", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cxi | > Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cse > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0105", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6250C > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0201", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300c > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0205", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4300c > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0305", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 5200C > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0401", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3400c > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0405", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2100C > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0505", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6300C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6350C | > Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6390C > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0601", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2200C > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0605", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > ... > # Dell 1600n > SYSFS{idVendor}=="413c", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5250", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > LABEL="libsane_rules_end" I don't see anything odd there at all. Can you run 'git bisect' to try to narrow down to the patch that caused the problem? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/