Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220620200644.1961936-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> <20220620200644.1961936-16-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220620200644.1961936-16-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:29:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd7Sq9RMqin_y-8qUEAJLaGfuqxAbe+qcMB22=bqkyZqg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/49] regmap-irq: Change the behavior of mask_writeonly
To:     Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@codeaurora.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
        Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, tharvey@gateworks.com,
        rjones@gateworks.com, Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
        orsonzhai@gmail.com, baolin.wang7@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-actions@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:08 PM Aidan MacDonald
<aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No drivers currently use mask_writeonly, and in its current form
> it seems a bit misleading. When set, mask registers will be
> updated with regmap_write_bits() instead of regmap_update_bits(),
> but regmap_write_bits() still does a read-modify-write under the
> hood. It's not a write-only operation.
>
> Performing a simple regmap_write() is probably more useful, since
> it can be used for chips that have separate set & clear registers
> for controlling mask bits. Such registers are normally volatile
> and read as 0, so avoiding a register read minimizes bus traffic.

Reading your explanations and the code, I would rather think about
fixing the regmap_write_bits() to be writeonly op.

Otherwise it's unclear what's the difference between
regmap_write_bits() vs. regmap_update_bits().

...

>         if (d->chip->mask_writeonly)
> -               return regmap_write_bits(d->map, reg, mask, val);
> +               return regmap_write(d->map, reg, val & mask);
>         else
>                 return regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg, mask, val);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko