Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc:     Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>, mst <mst@redhat.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] virtio: disable notification hardening by default
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEun6C9RgQVGq1B8BJMd9DyRQkSXj8shXVVhDymQYQLxgA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat GmbH
References: <20220620024158.2505-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <87y1xq8jgw.fsf@redhat.com>
 <CACGkMEun6C9RgQVGq1B8BJMd9DyRQkSXj8shXVVhDymQYQLxgA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.36 (https://notmuchmail.org)
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:58:19 +0200
Message-ID: <87sfny8hj8.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 21 2022, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:16 PM Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> The ifdeffery looks a big ugly, but I don't have a better idea.
>
> I guess you meant the ccw part, I leave the spinlock here in V1, but
> Michael prefers to have that.

Not doing the locking dance is good; I think the #ifdefs all over are a
bit ugly, but as I said, I can't think of a good, less-ugly way...

> In the future, we may consider removing that, one possible way is to
> have a per driver boolean for the hardening.

As in "we've reviewed and tested this driver, so let's turn it on for
every device bound to it"?