Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <5d0c291bb4a674a6733a18f9eb67cf40193732f4.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] evm: Use IS_ENABLED to initialize .enabled
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To:     xiujianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>,
        Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
        dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com
Cc:     linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:03:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <812c4ee9-56f7-900a-df48-f3ca3e15542f@huawei.com>
References: <20220606101042.89638-1-xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
         <64511312-df94-c40b-689c-5fc3823e91f5@pengutronix.de>
         <812c4ee9-56f7-900a-df48-f3ca3e15542f@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 18:58 +0800, xiujianfeng wrote:
> Hi, Ahmad
> 
> 在 2022/6/7 14:06, Ahmad Fatoum 写道:
> > On 06.06.22 12:10, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> >> Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XXX) instead of #ifdef/#endif statements to
> >> initialize .enabled, minor simplicity improvement.

The difference between using ifdef's and IS_ENABLED is when the
decision is made - build time, run time.   Please update the patch
description providing an explanation for needing to make the decision
at run time.

thanks,

Mimi