Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:12:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/106] 5.15.49-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YrHf6j/9ZvBWaNRd@kroah.com>
References: <20220620124724.380838401@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYsvY-0ub_CXbb5is0vRLQ9+SaPS8Op=9mZzCkeccUN+mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YrGHheX8D0iIz+db@kroah.com>
 <YrGTT/MLbCuHanhB@zx2c4.com>
 <YrGe64z7Al+V3bvB@kroah.com>
 <CA+G9fYs7+kA6pzCZZNBxrwx-2-OFZfV+5Zk4B8a=uE=VUFykFg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYs7+kA6pzCZZNBxrwx-2-OFZfV+5Zk4B8a=uE=VUFykFg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 05:06:08PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 16:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:45:51AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:55:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 02:06:06PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 18:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.49 release.
> > > > > > There are 106 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:47:02 +0000.
> > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.49-rc1.gz
> > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > greg k-h
> > > > >
> > > > > Following commit causing regression while building allmodconfig for clang-13
> > > > > on arm64, riscv and x86_64.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> > > > > >     netfs: gcc-12: temporarily disable '-Wattribute-warning' for now
> > > > >
> > > > > fs/afs/inode.c:29:32: error: unknown warning group
> > > > > '-Wattribute-warning', ignored [-Werror,-Wunknown-warning-option]
> > > > > #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wattribute-warning"
> > > > >                                ^
> > > > > 1 error generated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regressions:
> > > > >   - arm64/build/clang-13-allmodconfig - Failed
> > > > >   - riscv/build/clang-13-allmodconfig - Failed
> > > > >   - x86_64/build/clang-13-allmodconfig - Failed
> > > >
> > > > Does Linus's tree also show this issue?
> > >
> > > Linus' tree got rid of the pragma with:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/afs/inode.c?id=874c8ca1e60b2c564a48f7e7acc40d328d5c8733
> >
> > That isn't going to work on 5.15.y at all without a lot of hand tweaking :(
> >
> > > and then a subsequent cleanup:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/afs/inode.c?id=e81fb4198e27925b151aad1450e0fd607d6733f
> >
> > That doesn't work on 5.18 either.
> >
> > I guess I'll go revert the 5.15 patch here for now and let others sort
> > it all out when they want to build 5.15 with gcc-12.
> 
> Whereas clang-14 builds pass. I am considering this as a waiver.
> The problem is with clang-13. you may keep the above patch which is
> adding support for gcc-12.
> 
> We will stop building with clang-13 and we will upgrade our toolchains to
> clang-15 (when released and current clang-nightly builds are in production)
> and gcc-12 builds are running in staging. We would like to bump versions soon.

No, for now I've dropped this.  If people want to run gcc-12 builds then
I need backported patches for them.

thanks,

greg k-h