Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751053AbXEXUWU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 16:22:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752190AbXEXUVy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 16:21:54 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:32586 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751068AbXEXUVv (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 16:21:51 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=ijvdq180knHa2kqncpa5RLRMz+VW6BvcDrMi4uVN1fwXEHTXeJ4pbHNhoQ7FPnDrIcPB9D2Mrfog2CNcqEPG2odR31D5bYv5feD6HPP5Z45fZjpZKiQZ5Pby8X/mgpYbLvStVJVwb3X/ToiJUArxOAKJadgnJppA5pqWYAS0p7o= Subject: Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview) From: Romano Giannetti To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Chris Wright , Chuck Ebbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk In-Reply-To: References: <20070521191612.800400000@sous-sol.org> <4652070D.3090509@redhat.com> <20070521212522.GL3429@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <1179870110.16656.2.camel@localhost> <1180008394.15600.26.camel@localhost> <1180019201.15600.57.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:21:41 +0200 Message-Id: <1180038102.15241.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1102 Lines: 31 On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:52 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Ok. That was probably true even before you added the suspend ordering > > patch. > > Oh, no it apparently wasn't. I missed your other email that said > > "So, I tried to suspend without any card in the pcmcia slot. Guess what? > I extracted the card and the system did not suspend. Just stopped dead." > > so apparently the patch actually did matter for you. Can you double-check > and confirm? > Well, I've made a bit of a mess. The setup that has not the delay when the card is out is a plain 2.6.21.2 (without suspend ordering). The lockup ocurred on a 2.6.21.1 WITH the suspend ordering patch, but was just one time, after I plugged and unplugged the card several time. Could not reproduce it, however. Puzzled. Romano - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/