Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        nicola.mazzucato@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES out-of-spec checks
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:27:29 +0100
Message-Id: <165583954166.3333585.2295158486736398663.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220616170347.2800771-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
References: <20220616170347.2800771-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:03:47 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> A reply to CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES issued against a non rate-discrete clock
> should be composed of a triplet of rates descriptors (min/max/step)
> returned all in one reply message.
> 
> This is not always the case when dealing with some SCMI server deployed in
> the wild: relax such constraint while maintaining memory safety by checking
> carefully the returned payload size.
> 
> [...]

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks!

[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES out-of-spec checks
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/754f04cac3

--
Regards,
Sudeep