Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:36:40 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc:     "rcu@vger.kernel.org" <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-team@fb.com" <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        "rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 12/12] srcu: Block less aggressively for expedited
 grace periods
Message-ID: <20220621193640.GN1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <20220620222022.GA3839466@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
 <20220620222032.3839547-12-paulmck@kernel.org>
 <fef4fbd55b88481490d52cbd65e1b1f8@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fef4fbd55b88481490d52cbd65e1b1f8@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 07:43:08AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul E. McKenney [mailto:paulmck@kernel.org]
> > Sent: 20 June 2022 23:21
> > To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel-team@fb.com;
> > rostedt@goodmis.org; Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>; Zhangfei
> > Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; Paolo Bonzini
> > <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH rcu 12/12] srcu: Block less aggressively for expedited grace
> > periods
> > 
> > Commit 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers
> > from consuming CPU") fixed a problem where a long-running expedited
> > SRCU
> > grace period could block kernel live patching.  It did so by giving up
> > on expediting once a given SRCU expedited grace period grew too old.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, this added excessive delays to boots of embedded systems
> > running on qemu that use the ARM IORT RMR feature. 
> 
> As pointed out here[0]/[1], this delay has nothing to do with ARM IORT RMR
> feature. The delay is due to the "-bios QEMU_EFI.fd" line which emulates flash
> devices and requires excessive memslot ops during boot.

Good eyes, and I will update.

Are we stuck with the excessive memslot ops?  If not, great.

If we are stuck with them, there probably needs to be a way of adjusting
the SRCU delay parameters.  Making "-bios QEMU_EFI.fd" go quickly seems
to require quite a bit of spinning, more than is likely to be helpful
in general.

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> Shameer
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/110bbec5cee74efba0aad64360069a12@huawei.com/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8735g649ew.wl-maz@kernel.org/
> 
> 
>  This commit
> > therefore
> > makes the transition away from expediting less aggressive, increasing
> > the per-grace-period phase number of non-sleeping polls of readers from
> > one to three and increasing the required grace-period age from one jiffy
> > (actually from zero to one jiffies) to two jiffies (actually from one
> > to two jiffies).
> > 
> > Fixes: 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers
> > from consuming CPU")
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> > Reported-by: chenxiang (M)" <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
> > Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi  <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20615615-0013-5adc-584f-2b1d5c03ebfc@linaro
> > .org/
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > index 50ba70f019dea..0db7873f4e95b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct
> > *ssp)
> > 
> >  #define SRCU_INTERVAL		1	// Base delay if no expedited GPs
> > pending.
> >  #define SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL	10	// Maximum incremental delay from
> > slow readers.
> > -#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE	1	// Maximum per-GP-phase
> > consecutive no-delay instances.
> > +#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE	3	// Maximum per-GP-phase
> > consecutive no-delay instances.
> >  #define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY	100	// Maximum consecutive no-delay
> > instances.
> > 
> >  /*
> > @@ -522,16 +522,22 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct
> > *ssp)
> >   */
> >  static unsigned long srcu_get_delay(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> >  {
> > +	unsigned long gpstart;
> > +	unsigned long j;
> >  	unsigned long jbase = SRCU_INTERVAL;
> > 
> >  	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq),
> > READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp)))
> >  		jbase = 0;
> > -	if (rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq)))
> > -		jbase += jiffies - READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_start);
> > -	if (!jbase) {
> > -		WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay,
> > READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) + 1);
> > -		if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) >
> > SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE)
> > -			jbase = 1;
> > +	if (rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq))) {
> > +		j = jiffies - 1;
> > +		gpstart = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_start);
> > +		if (time_after(j, gpstart))
> > +			jbase += j - gpstart;
> > +		if (!jbase) {
> > +			WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay,
> > READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) + 1);
> > +			if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) >
> > SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE)
> > +				jbase = 1;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  	return jbase > SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL ? SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL : jbase;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
>