Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753666AbXEXVwR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 17:52:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750915AbXEXVwH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 17:52:07 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]:2423 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750885AbXEXVwG (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 17:52:06 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=IehFrdvU0Pv5QtqINIggYGqPwZwFkhs4BYZx/kDLYZhJeoQnQwRzffjDRV8lP6m3Gocn+wGrOS7z3idadBm98AjsB58bbsn0y53nEW/d9kZZHWdUTw/KkZ1X9WsJ3c3y/+W9BkutQIsSsDlREWKFWBdz8tqZdRZg5iLfZhG/D+8= Subject: Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview) From: Romano Giannetti To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Chris Wright , Chuck Ebbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk In-Reply-To: <20070524211237.GC1372@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <4652070D.3090509@redhat.com> <20070521212522.GL3429@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <1179870110.16656.2.camel@localhost> <1180008394.15600.26.camel@localhost> <1180019201.15600.57.camel@localhost> <1180037649.15241.6.camel@localhost> <20070524140154.c8e93d69.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070524211237.GC1372@uranus.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:51:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1180043514.15241.31.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 813 Lines: 23 On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:12 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > I really cannot see why it makes a difference. > If you use += (and :=) make will resolve EXTRA_CFLAGS when it see it. > Whereas with = make will resolve it only when actually referenced. > > But the way we use EXTRA_CFLAGS it should not matter. > If the fix above really helps nfs I need to take a closer look tomorrow. > No, you're right, it doesn't help. What could help is a form of saying to make "add this EXTRA_CFLAGS to whatever is specified in the command line". No idea if it exists. Romano - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/