Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757644AbXEXXNV (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 19:13:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750761AbXEXXNN (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 19:13:13 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:59657 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750759AbXEXXNM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 19:13:12 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.14,575,1170662400"; d="scan'208";a="231853457" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:13:04 -0700 Message-ID: <653FFBB4508B9042B5D43DC9E18836F5EE129C@scsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <465619CE.9000406@zytor.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo Thread-Index: AceeV8w7QTzjs3EqTqKOfHXgoO3/yQAALlkQ From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "Andi Kleen" , "Dave Jones" , "Andrew Morton" , "Brown, Len" , "linux-kernel" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2007 23:13:05.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[15CC0A80:01C79E59] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1126 Lines: 36 >-----Original Message----- >From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@zytor.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:04 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andi Kleen; Dave Jones; Andrew Morton; Brown, Len; linux-kernel >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration >feature in /proc/cpuinfo > >Venki Pallipadi wrote: >> >> I can do it in intel setup function. But, the feature may >not be activated >> unless the driver is loaded. Going by the hardware capability point >> of view, we can do it in setup function. >> >> The feature appears in CPUID 6 (called Power Management >Leaf) instead of >> regular CPUID 1 features. >> > >This sounds like it should be a new CPUID word? > Yes. But it only has 3 features defined right now. 2 in EAX and one in ECX. Should I use 2 new words for these bits or just use the software defined bits as in my earlier patch? Thanks, Venki - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/